|
||||||
Best Practices |
||||||
Newsletter
Register here to join our email list and stay tuned with updates about our solutions or industry best practices
| Sarbanes-Oxley Best PracticesThe New Best Practice for Corporate Governance The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was passed by Congress and signed into law in July 2002. It was designed to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of company financial disclosures. Consequently, SOX imposed major changes in corporate governance, financial reporting and auditing practices, while creating new financial oversight functions. Regardless of levels of security, the failure to perform best practice due diligence up front and throughout would result in non-compliance. In addition, audit and risk assessments are valueless without processes for continuous process improvement. SOX
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Have you read the Sarbanes-Oxley Act yet? You can download a copy here. More specifically, SOX compliance requires public companies to validate the accuracy and integrity of their financial management. In addition, companies must ensure that their processes and their documentation required for financial reporting and disclosure compliance are rigorous, must establish procedures for meeting their reporting obligations, and must address internal and external evaluations of the effectiveness of their controls over these financial processes. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has stepped up its monitoring and enforcement in this compliance area to ensure that the accounting scandals and corporate malfeasance occurring more prevalently in the last decade are not repeated. The “select SEC and market data – fiscal 2007” report issued for the SEC, listed over 200 enforcement cases, representing about one-third of its case load, primarily based on issuer reporting and disclosure noncompliance, The "Public Company Only" Myth There is a common myth propagated through the industry that SOX only impacts public companies. While it is true that SOX targets all U.S. public companies, it also impacts small and mid-sized businesses (SMBs), including those that are privately owned. For instance, smaller companies are affected by the law's provisions regarding document retention, criminal fraud and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Furthermore, SOX requirements will concern any private company seeking venture capital funding, applying for commercial loans, planning an IPO, anticipating being acquired and/or doing business with a public company. Smaller companies should also be alert to the passage of new state rules that mirror or piggyback on SOX. The SOX Compliance Framework Process oversight and documentation are facilitated through the deployment of enterprise compliance process control systems coupled with compliance intelligence technologies. Compliance intelligence is the integration of business intelligence systems with compliance process control systems that empower management to view aggregated compliance information upon demand. SOX Best PracticesThe new SOX provisions should be treated as a new best practices standard for corporate governance. Although not required by law, smaller companies will experience substantial benefits through the implementation of SOX compliance best practices. There is no silver bullet for SOX compliance. Section 302 and 404 require a combination of policy and procedure coupled with advanced technology to ensure compliance. The following best practices will help you navigate the maze of solution offerings available.
|
|||||
|
||||||